In the heart of Uttar Pradesh, where the fabric of society was once torn by lawlessness, a new narrative is emerging under the stewardship of Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. The recent Bahraich encounter, where two key accused in communal violence were apprehended, underscores a significant shift in the state’s approach to law enforcement. This incident, while raising eyebrows in some quarters, predominantly stands as a beacon of the state police’s proactive measures in maintaining law and order. The encounter in Bahraich, where two suspects allegedly involved in the killing of Ram Gopal Mishra during a Durga Puja procession attempted to flee towards Nepal, was met with swift action by the UP Police. This event did not occur in isolation but is part of a broader pattern where the UP Police, under Yogi Adityanath’s government, has shown remarkable alacrity in dealing with criminals who have long exploited the region’s porous borders for escape.
A Turnaround in Law Enforcement
Under previous administrations, Uttar Pradesh was often cited as a lawless land where crime rates soared unchecked. However, since Yogi Adityanath took office, there’s been a palpable change. The police, empowered with both the mandate and the means, have not only reduced crime rates but have also instilled a fear of law among those who once thought themselves above it. The Bahraich encounter is emblematic of this transformation, showcasing a police force that’s both vigilant and responsive.
Public Safety Over Political Correctness
The actions taken in Bahraich might be controversial, but they speak volumes about the government’s commitment to public safety over political correctness. When two of the five arrested attempted to flee, the police’s decision to engage, resulting in injuries to the accused, was not driven by vengeance but by the necessity to prevent escape. This incident, while criticized for its method, reflects a broader policy where law enforcement is encouraged to take decisive action when faced with resistance or flight.
Empowerment and Accountability
Critics might argue about the ethics of such encounters, pointing towards the “Thok Denge” policy attributed to Yogi Adityanath. However, what’s often overlooked is the empowerment this policy gives to the police. In a state where the ratio of police to population was daunting, this approach has paradoxically made the force more accountable. Officers know that their actions are under scrutiny, which, in turn, ensures that only necessary force is employed, not excessive brutality.
A Deterrent Against Crime
The encounters have undeniably set a precedent. Criminals, especially those with a communal bent, are now twice wary. The Bahraich incident, following the pattern of high-profile encounters like that of Vikas Dubey, sends a clear message: crime, particularly when fueled by communal discord, will be met with the full force of the law. This has not only deterred potential offenders but has also restored a semblance of order in areas previously known for their lawlessness.
Economic and Social Benefits
Law and order are not just about maintaining peace; they’re crucial for economic stability. Investors shy away from regions with high crime rates. Yogi’s approach, while controversial, has inadvertently boosted investor confidence in UP. The economic benefits of a safer environment are beginning to show, with increased industrial activity and tourism, both of which thrive in stable, secure environments.
The Debate on Methods
The method, however, remains a point of contention. While armchair critics may see these encounters as extrajudicial killings, the common public view them as necessary evils in regions where the legal process often falters due to corruption or fear. The debate here isn’t just about human rights but also about effective governance in challenging terrains.
Conclusion
The Bahraich encounter, therefore, isn’t just another news headline but a chapter in the evolving story of Uttar Pradesh under Yogi Adityanath. While not without its critics, this approach to law enforcement has undeniably brought about a transformation. The state, once synonymous with crime, is now setting an example of how proactive policing, even if controversial, can lead to substantial improvements in law and order. This shift, while needing refinement in its execution, deserves recognition for its intent and, to an extent, its impact. In the complex narrative of governance, sometimes, it’s not just about the method but the message it sends – that in UP, lawlessness is no longer the order of the day.
